Talk:Convention of Calcutta
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Consultations
[edit]I am afraid we need HISTRS for issues like this. It is not true that Tibet was't consulted or that Sikkim wasn't consulted. They were consuted and they were overridden. This is "imperial politics". But the Chinese made a show, and didn't have effective control over Tibet. That was not the case for Britain and Sikkim. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:09, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Start-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- Start-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- Start-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- Start-Class Indian military history articles
- Indian military history task force articles
- Start-Class South Asian military history articles
- South Asian military history task force articles
- Start-Class India articles
- Mid-importance India articles
- Start-Class India articles of Mid-importance
- Start-Class Sikkim articles
- Low-importance Sikkim articles
- Start-Class Sikkim articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Sikkim articles
- Start-Class Indian history articles
- Low-importance Indian history articles
- Start-Class Indian history articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Indian history articles
- WikiProject India articles